Let them build with AI
Anyone can one-shot working code now, so Candela evaluates the engineering judgement behind every decision a candidate makes.
College London
See how each candidate builds with AI
Your applicants build a real project with AI and answer for every decision they accept, so you see the judgement behind the work, not just the code.
Shipped the charge flow and defended every trade-off she accepted.
Clean code, but leaned on AI for the hard call without questioning it.
Shipped it, but let the scope drift past the brief.
Old competence signals are killed by AI so, the only way to evaluate engineers is by watching what & how they Build
A clean CV is one prompt away.
The take-home passes itself.
Tell me about a hard bug you fixed.
Certainly. In a previous role I diagnosed a race condition by...
How would you scale this service?
Great question. I would begin by profiling...
The answers come rehearsed.
11,000 job applications a minute on LinkedIn, up 45 per cent in a year.
LinkedIn, reported by The New York Times, 2025
Replacing an employee can cost 50 to 200 per cent of their salary.
SHRM, 2022
Paste the job description, get a Builders' Project
Send the job description, any past assessment, and any rubric you already use. Candela turns them into one live project, and all your applicants build it in our IDE.
Sample project. Yours is drafted from your job description and your bar, and you edit it before it goes live.
A Candela Credential for each applicant
Instead of thousands of lines of AI-written code, you get a Candela Credential for each applicant, and the questions to ask the strongest face to face.
Maya Rao
Payment Service · Builders' ProjectChose idempotency keys over retry counting, and explained the trade-off unprompted.
First webhook she had written. By the end of the build she was reasoning about delivery order.
Your team member can follow the payment flow from the log alone.
Caught the AI indexing the wrong column and said why the query plan changed.
Cut the reporting dashboard to ship the charge flow working end to end.
The interview pack
Three questions, each drawn from a decision in her build.You chose idempotency keys over retry counting. Where does that choice break?
From the evidence under Programming Judgement, 87
How would your webhook handling hold up if event volume grew tenfold?
From the evidence under Learning Velocity, 79
You cut the reporting dashboard to ship the charge flow. What told you that was the right trade?
From the evidence under Outcome Ownership, 81
The Credential tells you who is worth an interview, and the questions come from the calls they made, so you interview on the substance behind their decisions.
AI writes the code and the engineer architects
Each accepted AI suggestion opens a question the candidate answers in their own words, so what you see is the engineer behind the AI.
You accepted a retry loop around the payment call. What happens if the first attempt succeeded but the response was lost?
The charge carries an idempotency key, so a retry reads the first result back instead of charging twice. I checked the gateway honours the key before I accepted.
Reasoning loggedWhy keep this cache?
What breaks first under load?
Copy-pasting through the project leaves fingerprints in the log.
Prove how well you build with AI
Build a Builders' Project, answer for the decisions you make, and let the best teams come to you. Your reasoning is the work sample.
Try the live demo →Where engineers prove how well they build with AI, and where the best teams evaluate that talent
Bring a role you are hiring for. We will show you the Builders' Project for it, and the Candela Credential you get back.
A 30-minute demo, no prep needed.
Prefer to look first? Try the live demo